Good-bye old friend (July 6, 2011)

Immediacy CMS got lost in an alphabet soup of A's, C's, M's, and P's. Someone must have decided it would be a cool idea to give 2 different products similar, all most identical names: CMC & CMP. In 2007 you would have known these products as Immediacy and Morello.

CM7 recipe

Take 1 Immediacy and add to marketing mix
Gently pour 1 Morello
Continue stirring until one marketing story has been created
Allow to rise in a warm market
Bake till nicely brown

Discard Immediacy residue which should compost quite nicely.

Can 2 go into 1?

If Immediacy were a car I reckon it would be a faithful old Morris Minor. Uncomplicated, trusted by many, some learnt to drive CMS software starting here. Basic. reliable. Typically British!

226387244_82621f7f19

Morello on the other-hand has some deeply technical under-pinnings. But hey! It's powerful and it's sophisticated and therefore fundamentally different to Immediacy.

468080133_6f4d04e2d0

If you're used to utilitarian convenience perhaps Immediacy (CMC) was a comfortable option. If the upgrade offer is just too tempting — you might want to consider my thoughts about migrating content: http://johngoode.com/content-confusion. Can 2 go into 1? In a few circumstances the upgrade will mean a welcome addition to the drive-way.

 

 

Them and Us (June 9, 2011)

The title implies to groups, I'm not sure which category you're in, I have spent time in both camps: WCM vendor and Digital Agency. Inextricably linked and yet, entirely different.

WCM Vendor

While working at Immediacy I'd often hear this type of conversation.

Commercial: Client X wants us to do the implementation, it's worth Y, let's get our PS team on it.

Delivery team: There's a UX component — don't have the skills in-house, there's an integration piece — don't have the skills or development environment. This project is way outside our comfort-zone.

The commercial team and client both rationalise: Vendor built the product, vendor knows best how to implement and deliver our project.

That's a bit like concluding the best concert pianist has to be someone called Steinway.

Digital Agency

Not all agencies make great pianists! Seriously though, a digital agency is a very different animal to a WCM vendor, the 2 parties should not be confused. When selecting your agency to deliver a WCM project, you'll want to be sure they have the technical depth; accredited developers with experience that stretches beyond one implementation would be a good place to start. Your chosen agency will also have UX and design skills and experienced project managers. They will have a number of disciplines onboard that a vendor does not pretend to understand. Ask a vendor to define what a planner does — it's like asking a northener where Windsor Castle is!

Conclusion

Adrian Newey would not drive his formula 1 racing car and expect to win.

Henry Engelhard Steinway, if he was alive, would not be found playing his beloved instrument in public — for money!

Doctors do not have the time or skill to run the NHS.

Agencies and vendors happily co-exist in the WCM eco-system. Happy providing they know and value their respective roles.

 

/discuss

Is WEM for Local Gov? (January 4, 2011)

I've been thinking about this WEM stuff (Web Engagement Management). And I want to know more: what is it? and who's it for? 5 May 2010, Brice Dunwoodie defined WEM this way on CMS Wire's website.

The 5 Pillars of WEM

Web Engagement Management is a composite concept. These are the 5 parts we consider its core:

  1. Content Optimization
    This include native or tightly integrated analytics, content and experience personalization, multi-variate testing and optimization and SEO.
  2. Multi-channel Management
    Consistency is important and WEM maintains it by delivering the same message/experience to customers across devices and channels both online and offline.
  3. Conversational Engagement
    WEM supports this through communities, user generated content, commenting, trackbacks, micro-blogging, social media integration, analytics, social media monitoring and sentiment analysis.
  4. Demand Generation
    Targeted marketing is huge. With an overall goal of increasing the number and quality of relationships, WEM comes to the aid of demand generators through need recognition, relevancy enhancements and engagement triggers.
  5. Sales Automation
    Love isn't the only two-way street, and as social media analyst Jeremiah Owyang put it, "real-time isn't fast enough." This idea is manifest in WEM in areas like two-way CRM integration, social CRM and e-mail or other campaign integration with the content platform.

Let's do some analysis to better understand if WEM is for Local Government.

Scenario 1

North Somerset Council, my local authority want web-engaged audiences because these audiences can self-serve and therefore reduce contact costs.

Content Optimisation

— Web analytics will confirm what the council knows to be the busy, useful, frequently-used parts of the site.
— Personalisation won't be terribly helpful as assumptions made about my visit could be wildly inaccurate.
— Multi-variate testing? Well this ain't no Tesco or ASDA website and anyway, MV testing is seen as an ongoing exercise, not just a project. And budgets won't stretch even if the benefits were proven.
— SEO? Well North Somerset doesn't have any competitors so SEO, though important, isn't going to get the lion's share of budget.
— UX is not listed under content optimisation, yet it can be treated as a project cost and will yield useful results even if the study is heuristic.

Multi-channel Management

I take issue with the assertion that WEM delivers consistency of message/experience both on- and off-line. Please tell me how that's going to happen? Unless organisations adopt a web-first publishing model I cannot understand how WEM will orchestrate offline publishing or say, an above the line campaign.

Conversational Engagement

The statement: WEM supports this through communities is woolly. Would a WEM solution involve building a community? Or, is this a Facebook connector for example? Put this issue of community definition to oneside and I have to say the remainder of the list is bang-on. For me, conversation is the central pillar of Engagement. The term engagement should as much about conversation as it is about conversion if WEM is to benefit an organisation as much as its audiences. I'd like to think of this pillar as *real conversations between real people* and I hope they occur where the people choose.

Mchannel

Demand Generation

Don't know about this one. Anyone from local government care to comment?

Sales Automation

In a local authority context, Sales Automation could be renamed integration. Systems such as WCM, CRM, Email and Analytics need present a dash board of information about the #topics being discussed, about the citizens involved in discussion and the sentiments of conversations.

Qs

Conclusion

WEM is relevant to local authorities in part. These organisations don't sell and neither do they compete for your business. But they do provide vital services funded by tax payers and they are accountable for the services they provide. A joined-up engagement strategy, under-pined by a sensible collection of joined-up systems will help local government engage with its citizens.

Further scenarios to follow…

 

Customer advocacy in software development (November 18, 2010)

Developing software is a tricky business. Whether you're involved in bespoke or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software development, it's a process that benefits from the input of a customer advocate.
My experience of software development has been Internet oriented for the past 15 years and includes web content management systems (WCMS), mobile applications and bespoke systems for recruitment, investor relations and sponsorship asset management. In each of these contexts, customer advocacy played a key role in deciding what was to be developed.

Read the rest of this post »

Content is the significant-other-half (October 21, 2010)

If you're migrating content from one web content management (WCM) platform to another you may have obstacles to overcome:

1. new tech to learn
2. the realisation that *content* is not the side show
3. content needs owners — that's people that are accountable for making sure content is accurate, useful and up-to-date
4. accurately budget for costs. including the hidden ones and gotchas
5. accurately plan content migration work effort and hence duration of content freeze
6. understand what's useful and what's not; content, applications
7. what are the *must have* applications that become important elements of the new WCM?

Read the rest of this post »